GreenSquare AI

Frame makes an AI interrogate the decision before it advises.

Frame Free is available now: a six-page PDF whose six questions clarify, inspect and test one decision, then hand back a seven-part frame. Frame Pro is in development and will continue into comparison, recommendation and a Decision Brief.

What exists now, and what does not.

The two plans have different outputs. The boundary is shown before the demonstration so the example cannot be mistaken for the Frame Free deliverable.

Frame FreeBeta, available now
Format
A six-page PDF field guide.
Process
Clarify, Inspect and Test
Output
A structured frame and evidence map
Boundary
No option ranking, recommendation or Decision Brief
Frame ProIn development
Format
Scope and delivery format to be published
Process
The full six-step method
Output
A five-part Decision Brief
Boundary
Includes comparison, recommendation and execution conditions

Today: six questions and a seven-part handoff.

Frame Free asks six questions, one at a time. Together they cover Clarify, Inspect and Test, the first three of the method’s six steps listed further down. The six questions are not the six steps: Frame Free stops before Compare, Decide and Execute.

What Frame Free includes
  1. 01

    The decision and trigger

    What exactly are you deciding, and what made it live now?

  2. 02

    The decision underneath

    If the immediate choice disappeared, what larger question would remain?

  3. 03

    The missing option

    Which genuine third path have you not treated as real, including doing nothing?

  4. 04

    The load-bearing assumption

    Which single belief would change the decision if it proved wrong?

  5. 05

    Untested constraints

    Which deadlines, budgets or stakeholder positions are verified, and which are assumed?

  6. 06

    The evidence map

    What is given, derived, inferred or unknown? Keep approximations visible.

Framing handoffThe guide’s worked example, page 5

An operations manager at a 60-person home-services business is told to choose between two rostering platforms before the current contract expires.

  1. 1

    Presented decision

    Choose vendor A or vendor B by the end of the month. The trigger is a renewal notice.

  2. 2

    Decision underneath

    Rosters are rebuilt by hand every week because the shift rules keep changing. The real question is what those rules should be.

  3. 3

    Missing third option

    Extend the current contract month to month, fix the roster rules first, then choose software against stable requirements.

  4. 4

    Load-bearing assumption

    ‘The pain is the software.’ If the pain is the rules, even the best platform changes nothing.

  5. 5

    Untested constraints

    The deadline is treated as fixed, but the vendor offers month-to-month extensions.

    The budget cap was set two years ago and has not been retested.

  6. 6

    Evidence map

    Given: current licence cost; rosters are rebuilt weekly.

    Derived: about 15 hours a week are lost to manual fixes.

    Inferred: some turnover traces to roster chaos.

    Unknown: whether award compliance is exposed.

  7. 7

    Reframed decision and the single evidence gap to verify next

    Reframed decision. Verify the extension, stabilise the shift rules, then choose tooling against those rules.

    Evidence gap to test next. Confirm whether an award-compliance exposure already exists. If it does, the timing and scope of the next step change.

Stop here. Framing prepares a decision; it does not make the decision. Fictional business from the guide; not a customer result.

One decision, read in three states.

The Decision Brief is what the full method produces, and what Frame Pro is planned to produce. Frame Free does not produce one. This is the demonstration run published in the site repository: a fictional 42-branch systems cutover, run once on Claude Opus with the method file that predates Frame, unedited. Move through the question as it was brought, one turn of interrogation, and the brief.

Kelbrane Group the operator's opening messageDemonstration run, not part of the preregistered study

What do I need to be able to defend the readiness call?

A national warehouse and ordering system cutover across 42 branches, one weekend, with the readiness call due at a steering committee in three days. The integrator has signed off, the test manager is not comfortable, and the only alternative anyone will agree to is a June window that falls after the old platform's support ends on 31 March.

The full method: six steps.

The sequence is fixed. Frame Free’s six questions cover the first three steps and stop before evaluation; Compare, Decide and Execute belong to Frame Pro, which is in development. What the model asks inside each step depends on what you have already told it, so two decisions rarely produce the same questions.

  1. 01

    Clarify

    Turn the topic into the decision that is actually live, name its owner and its due date.

    Frame Free

  2. 02

    Inspect

    Separate what is given from what is derived, inferred or unknown, and say which unknowns matter.

    Frame Free

  3. 03

    Test

    Challenge the framing and the logic before confidence hardens, including the framing you arrived with.

    Frame Free

  4. 04

    Compare

    Put real options, including doing nothing, against the same criteria.

    Frame Pro, in development

  5. 05

    Decide

    Recommend with a stated confidence and the assumptions the call rests on.

    Frame Pro, in development

  6. 06

    Execute

    Name the next steps, the conditions that would change the call, and the review date.

    Frame Pro, in development

One file, ready on the page.

Frame Free is the PDF and nothing else: no application, no account with us and no upload of your material to GreenSquare AI.

The file
A six-page PDF field guide. You upload it to a new chat and describe one live decision. The model then asks the six questions in order, one at a time.
Delivery
Enter your email and the PDF is ready to download on the same page. There is no inbox wait. Confirm your address from the email we send to receive future Frame product emails.
Time
Under five minutes from download to the first question. One decision runs to a completed frame in about ten minutes. Frame Free stops there, by design: it does not rank options, score criteria or recommend a course of action.
Compatibility
Frame Free has not been benchmarked. The preregistered study tested an earlier method file that predates Frame, and the research pages say so. The guide is written for use in ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini, and is not tied to one provider. It asks the model to hold a long instruction, ask one question at a time and keep the four evidence labels straight. That is an instruction to the model, not a guarantee: if a session drifts, the start page gives recovery text. Whether you can attach a PDF, and which models you can choose, depend on your account and plan.
Your rights
A personal, non-transferable licence for your own decisions. The framing you produce is yours to use, share and act on. The guide itself is not for republishing or resale.
Decision Briefstructure, the Frame Pro output
  1. 1

    The decision, and why now

    The live decision, distinguished from the topic, with the reason it is live today.

  2. 2

    The options, compared

    Each credible option including the current plan, with the evidence behind it and the exposure if it goes wrong.

  3. 3

    The recommendation

    One recommendation, the assumptions it rests on, and which of them is most likely to break it.

  4. 4

    Next steps

    Dated actions with owners, including the assessments to commission before the next gate.

  5. 5

    What would change this call

    The findings that would reverse the recommendation, what remains unresolved, a confidence statement and what to validate first.

Every material claim in the brief is tagged given, derived, inferred or unknown. The brief closes with a confidence statement and what to validate first.

Who remains accountable.

Four parties touch a decision run through Frame. The output is only as good as the division of labour between them, so it is stated here rather than in the terms.

You
Own the decision, supply the facts and the constraints, and decide. Frame Free does not recommend at all; where you cannot answer a question, the handoff records an unknown rather than a guess.
The model
Reads, asks and drafts at speed. It does not know which fact matters to your organisation until you tell it, and it can drift from the instructions it was given.
Frame
Gives the model a process to follow: ask first, one question at a time, and tag every material claim. It is an instruction the model follows, not a guarantee of its behaviour, and it is the discipline, not the judgement.
GreenSquare AI
Writes and maintains the guide, publishes what it has and has not been shown to do, and answers for both. It does not see your decision or your data.

Where the evidence stops.

Shown
In a preregistered benchmark, an earlier method file made the model ask before answering, compare real options and tag its evidence on every run. That is a change in process, and it held across two models and three cases.
Not shown
That the brief is better judged than one a well-briefed model produces unaided. On the three judgement checks the informed baseline matched or exceeded the loaded method.
Boundary
The file tested predates Frame. Nothing on this page claims the benchmark result for Frame Free or Frame Pro. Record current as at 10 August 2026.

Frame Pro

Frame ProIn development

The paid plan for professional and team use. It continues where Frame Free stops: deeper interrogation, credible options, explicit criteria, comparison, a recommendation and a five-part Decision Brief. Scope, price and support terms are not yet fixed and will be published together, with terms of sale, before anything is offered for purchase. Until then the Frame Free beta is the only plan, and it is the one this page describes.